A light, airy, effervescent, blog of grave consequence. (NOT!) Dedicated to those of us who must respond to negative stimuli by Chernobyling (entombing in concrete) our innermost thoughts.

Location: Slaughter, Louisiana, United States

A semi-gruntled corporate reliability engineer trying to make ends meet while keeping my wife happy, and myself out of the asylum.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

We're the Government. We're here to help...

I'm sorry, but we must confiscate and kill your children.

Thought crimes prosecuted in New Jersey. Building a soccer field for the sand-maggots in Guantanamo Bay.

Now a new article from the Journal of Medical Ethics:

"After-birth abortion: why should the baby live?"

It's a pay only article, but the abstract is stunning.

"Abortion is largely accepted even for reasons that do not have anything to do with the fetus' health. By showing that (1) both fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons, (2) the fact that both potential persons is morally irrelevant and (3) adoption is not always in the best interest of actual people, the authors argue that what we call ‘after-birth abortion’ (killing a newborn) should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is, including cases where the newborn is not disabled."

Oh well. At least the abortionistas are finally owning the true morality of what they do.

PKD would not be amused.


Anonymous Sweet Pea said...

This makes me physically ill. Seriously - it makes Hitler seem like an angel. This is what horror looks like.

12:38 PM  
Blogger Brian Gallimore said...


4:19 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home